The Mortgage Expert Witness

Mortgage & Real Estate Expert Witness – Mortgage Fraud | Real Estate Fraud

Archive for the ‘Fraud (buyer)’ Category

Mortgage Scamster Sentenced in New York

Posted by mortgageforensics on May 22, 2009

 LEV L. DASSIN, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that DOMINICK DEVITO was sentenced to 51 months in prison on May 19, 2009, by United States District Judge BARBARA S. JONES in Manhattan federal court for mortgage fraud, insurance fraud and obstruction of justice.

According to Counts One, Thirteen and Fourteen of the Indictment, the charges to which DEVITO pleaded guilty; other documents filed in the case; and statements made during the guilty plea and sentencing proceedings: From January 2002 through November 2004, DEVITO was the leader of a fraudulent real estate investment scheme that purchased multimillion-dollar residential properties in various communities in Westchester County — including Purchase, New York — with loans obtained through the submission of false and misleading information to banks and other lenders. DEVITO identified properties for sale, orchestrated the purchase of the properties, and performed construction work at the properties.

In addition, from January 2003 through February 2005, DEVITO engaged in a scheme to defraud insurance companies by submitting false and misleading insurance claims and supporting documents for water damage caused by broken pipes at several of the homes he and his co-conspirators had purchased as part of the mortgage fraud scheme. DEVITO obstructed justice in connection with his sentencing in 2003 in Manhattan federal court for racketeering and mortgage fraud in an earlier case. Specifically, DEVITO submitted false and misleading information regarding the value of his assets and his personal net worth following his sale of a property located in Purchase, New York.

DEVITO, 45, pleaded guilty before Judge JONES on July 22, 2008. In addition to his 51-month prison term, Judge JONES ordered a supervised release of 3 years and ordered DEVITO to forfeit a total of $1.4 million.

Posted in Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor) | Leave a Comment »

Ex-NFL Star Indicted for Mortgage Fraud

Posted by mortgageforensics on June 15, 2007

FIVE INDICTED IN MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEME

[HOUSTON, TX] – A licensed Texas attorney and real estate developer, a sports agent, two bank loan officers, and a real estate appraiser have been indicted in a multimillion dollar mortgage fraud scheme, United States Attorney Don DeGabrielle, interim Special Agent in Charge Alex J. Turner of the FBI Houston Division, and Special Agent in Charge Daniel P. Salas of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced today.

Jerome Karam, 44, of Friendswood, TX, a real estate developer and licensed Texas lawyer; Dwight Sean Jones, 44, of Beverly Hills, CA, a former NFL player and sports agent; Tommy Jay Trammel, 44, and David Ranostaj, 40, both of Houston and former loan officers with Southwest Bank of Texas, Bank of Houston and Whitney National Bank, and Jay Westrick, 44, of Houston, a real estate appraiser, have been charged in a 12-count indictment for their alleged involvement in a mortgage fraud scheme that allegedly reached every aspect of a real estate loan: seller, buyer/borrower, loan officer, appraiser, escrow officer, and title company. For the full article...

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), embezzlement, fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 1 Comment »

Did You ‘State’ Your Income On Your ‘Stated Income’ Loan?

Posted by mortgageforensics on June 12, 2007

Well, for those of you who live in Arizona, we hope you did not inflate your income on your loan application. House Bill 2040 – about to be signed by the Governor – makes that a felony in your state. Arizona is among the top 10 states in the number of foreclosures filed this year.

Eric Forster

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 1 Comment »

From the FBI: All You Need to Know About Mortgage Fraud

Posted by mortgageforensics on May 27, 2007

MORTGAGE FRAUD INDICATORS

Inflated Appraisals
• Exclusive use of one appraiser

Increased Commissions/Bonuses – Brokers and Appraisers
• Bonuses paid (outside or at settlement) for fee-based services
• Higher than customary fees

Falsifications on Loan Applications
• Buyers told/explained how to falsify the mortgage application
• Requested to sign blank application

Fake Supporting Loan Documentation
• Requested to sign blank employee or bank forms
• Requested to sign other types of blank forms

Purchase Loans Disguised as Refinance
• Purchase loans that are disguised as refinances
requires less documentation/lender scrutiny

Investors-Short Term Investments with Guaranteed Re-Purchase
• Investors used to flip property prices for fixed percentage
• Multiple “Holding Companies” utilized to increase
property values

COMMON MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEMES

Property Flipping – Property is purchased, falsely appraised at a higher value, and then quickly sold. What makes property illegal is that the appraisal information is fraudulent. The schemes typically involve one or more of the following: fraudulent appraisals, doctored loan documentation, inflating buyer income, etc. Kickbacks to buyers, investors, property/loan brokers, appraisers, title company employees are common in this scheme. A home worth $20,000 may be appraised for $80,000 or higher in this type of scheme.

Silent Second – The buyer of a property borrows the down payment from the seller through the issuance of a non-disclosed second mortgage. The primary lender believes the borrower has invested his own money in the down payment, when in fact, it is borrowed. The second mortgage may not be recorded to further conceal its status from the primary lender.

Nominee Loans/Straw Buyers – The identity of the borrower is concealed through the use of a nominee who allows the borrower to use the nominee’s name and credit history to apply for a loan.

Fictitious/Stolen Identity – A fictitious/stolen identity may be used on the loan application. The applicant may be involved in an identity theft scheme: the applicant’s name, personal identifying information and credit history are used without the true person’s knowledge.

Inflated Appraisals – An appraiser acts in collusion with a borrower and provides a misleading appraisal report to the lender. The report inaccurately states an inflated property value.

Foreclosure Schemes – The perpetrator identifies homeowners who are at risk of defaulting on loans or whose houses are already in foreclosure. Perpetrators mislead the homeowners into believing that they can save their homes in exchange for a transfer of the deed and up-front fees. The perpetrator profits from these schemes by remortgaging the property or pocketing fees paid by the homeowner.

Equity Skimming – An investor may use a straw buyer, false income documents, and false credit reports, to obtain a mortgage loan in the straw buyer’s name. Subsequent to closing, the straw buyer signs the property over to the investor in a quit claim deed which relinquishes all rights to the property and provides no guaranty to title. The investor does not make any mortgage payments and rents the property until foreclosure takes place several months later.

Air Loans – This is a non-existent property loan where there is usually no collateral. An example of an air loan would be where a broker invents borrowers and properties, establishes accounts for payments, and maintains custodial accounts for escrows. They may set up an office with a bank of telephones, each one used as the employer, appraiser, credit agency, etc., for verification purposes.

Mortgage Fraud Prevention Measures

General Fraud Tips

Mortgage Fraud is a growing problem throughout the United States. People want to believe their homes are worth more than they are, and with housing booms going on throughout the U.S., there are people who try to capitalize on the situation and make an easy profit.

Tips to protect you from becoming a victim of Mortgage Fraud

• Get referral for real estate and mortgage professionals. Check the licenses of the industry professionals with state, county, or city regulatory agencies.
• If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. An outrageous promise of extraordinary profit in a short period of time signals a problem.
• Be wary of strangers and unsolicited contacts, as well as high-pressure sales techniques.
• Look at written information to include recent comparable sales in the area, and other documents such as tax assessments to verify the value of the property.
• Understand what you are signing and agreeing to–If you do not understand,
re-read the documents, or seek assistance from an attorney.
• Make sure the name on your application matches the name on your identification.
• Review the title history to determine if the property has been sold multiple times within a short period–It could mean that this property has been “flipped” and the value falsely inflated.
• Know and understand the terms of your mortgage–Check your information against the information in the loan documents to ensure they are accurate and complete.
• Never sign any loan documents that contain blanks–This leaves you vulnerable to fraud.
• Check out the tips on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) website at http://www.StopMortgageFraud.com for additional advice on avoiding mortgage fraud.

Mortgage Debt Elimination Schemes

• Be aware of e-mails or web-based advertisements that promote the elimination of mortgage loans, credit card and other debts while requesting an up-front fee to prepare documents to satisfy the debt. The documents are typically entitled Declaration of Voidance, Bond for Discharge of Debt, Bill of Exchange, Due Bill, Redemption Certificate, or other similar variations. These documents do not achieve what they purport.
• There is no magic cure-all to relieve you of debts you incurred.
• Borrowers may end up paying thousands of dollars in fees without the elimination or reduction of any debt.

Foreclosure Fraud Schemes

Perpetrators mislead the homeowners into believing that they can save their homes in exchange for a transfer of the deed, usually in the form of a Quit-Claim Deed, and up-front fees. The perpetrator profits from these schemes by remortgaging the property or pocketing fees paid by the homeowner without preventing the foreclosure. The victim suffers the loss of the property as well as the up-front fees.

• Be aware of offers to “save” homeowners who are at risk of defaulting on loans or whose houses are already in foreclosure.
• Seek a qualified Credit Counselor or attorney to assist.
Predatory Lending Schemes

• Before purchasing a home, research information about prices of homes in the neighborhood.
• Shop for a lender and compare costs. Beware of lenders who tell you that they are your only chance of getting a loan or owning your own home.
• Beware of “No Money Down” loans–This is a gimmick used to entice consumers to purchase property that they likely cannot afford or are not qualified to purchase. Be wary of mortgage professional who falsely alter information to qualify the consumer for the loan.
• Do not let anyone convince you to borrow more money than you can afford to repay.
• Do not let anyone persuade you into making a false statement such as overstating your income, the source of your down payment, or the nature and length of your employment.
• Never sign a blank document or a document containing blanks.
• Read and carefully review all loan documents signed at closing or prior to closing for accuracy, completeness and omissions.
• Be aware of cost or loan terms at closing that are not what you have agreed to.
• Do not sign anything you do not understand.
• Be suspicious if the cost of a home improvement goes up if you accept the contractor’s financing.
• If it sounds too good to be true–it probably is!

Posted in Contract law, Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), embezzlement, fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 2 Comments »

A Silent Second Can Kill You

Posted by mortgageforensics on May 14, 2007

(Jack Guttenberg for Inman News)

The term “silent second” is used to describe self-serving or perhaps fraudulent schemes where house sellers accept second mortgages as part of a sale transaction, without the full knowledge of the first mortgage lender. The “silence” refers to the absence of full disclosure to the first mortgage lender.

The smaller of the frauds arises when the second mortgage replaces part or all of a down payment. For example, the buyer and seller agree on a price of $200,000; the buyer has a commitment for a first mortgage loan of $180,000, but doesn’t have the $20,000 required for the down payment. To make the deal work, the seller agrees to accept a silent second mortgage for $15,000. As far as the first mortgage lender knows, the down payment is $20,000, but in fact, it is only $5,000.

The silent second increases risk to the first mortgage lender because it takes only a 5 percent decline in home value to eliminate the borrower’s equity — rather than the 20 percent decline that the lender counted on. When equity is depleted, some borrowers stop paying on their mortgages.

This silent second is also risky to the seller because it can’t be recorded at the time of the sale — that would give the game away. This means that the seller has an unsecured loan until the transaction is completed and the lien can be recorded. How long the seller must wait before recording the lien is negotiated between the parties. The longer the seller waits, the greater the risk that other liens will be placed on the property, which will endanger the silent second.

An even more serious deception of the first mortgage lender arises when the silent second is used to inflate the sale price beyond the true value of the house in order to increase the size of the first mortgage. Assume the same house as before with buyer and seller agreeing on a true price of $200,000, but in this case the buyer has no down payment. They collude to set a fictitious price of $222,200, on the basis of which the first mortgage lender agrees to lend $200,000. This is 90 percent of $222,200 but 100 percent of the true value of $200,000. The seller agrees to a second mortgage for $22,200.

In this case, the first mortgage lender knows about the second mortgage. What the lender doesn’t know — where the silence comes in — is that after the transaction is completed the seller will forgive the second mortgage. In this way, the lender is deceived into making a 100 percent loan, believing that it is a 90 percent loan.

Posted in Fraud (buyer), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

That Option ARM loan Could Cost You Your House

Posted by mortgageforensics on April 9, 2007

By Eric Forster

I expect to see a wave of foreclosures in the next two years, as Option ARM loans reach their trigger points and are reset by the lenders. Here is what happened to one buyer in Los Angeles:

The buyer purchased a home in 2004 for $1,000,000. As this is Los Angeles, $1 mil doesn’t really buy you much of a house – in this case, a 1,200 square foot house in a typical middle-class neighborhood. The buyer took out a $900,000 Option ARM mortgage, with a starting payment rate (good for the first 12 months) of 1.00%, and a fully-indexed rate of 8.45%, adjusted monthly. A payment rate of 1.00% calls for a monthly payment of $2,895, which is quite a bit lower than the full payment, approximately $6,890 per month. The difference between the minimum payment and the full one, almost $4,000, is added to the balance of the loan.

By the end of the first year, $48,000 had been added to the balance of the loan. A year late, the balance of the loan was $990,000, and the 10% trigger was activated. Under the terms of the loan, whenever the balance of the loan gets to be 110% of the original loan amount, the option of making minimum payment is terminated immediately and the new balance – $990,000 – is amortized over the remaining 28 years using the then-current interest rate (for simplicity’s sake, we’ll assume that the full rate is still 8.45%). The new monthly payment for the next 28 years is reset to $7,577 per month – quite a jump from that original payment, and quite possibly a payment the borrower cannot afford.

The blame for getting into this kind of a loan can be assigned probably to the lender, who didn’t fully explain the ramifications of obtaining a ticking time-bomb, or the realtor who pushed the buyer into a purchase he could not afford. Either way, many attorneys will be kept busy representing Option ARM buyers who’ve lost – or are about to lose – their homes.

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

“Zero Down” Fraud Stopped in Brooklyn

Posted by mortgageforensics on December 5, 2006

There is very little mortgage lenders can do to prevent “Zero Down” scams during times of easy money and rising property values:

NEW YORK – A Brooklyn mortgage fraud ring duped homebuyers and lenders by falsifying documents and overstating property values, ruining the credit of many people who bought homes in minority neighborhoods, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said Wednesday.Spitzer sued 11 people over the scheme, which he said lasted from 2002 until early this year and hurt dozens of borrowers and lenders, in a lawsuit filed with the state supreme court in Manhattan. To read the full article…

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (loan agent), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

Steal of a Deal

Posted by mortgageforensics on November 8, 2006

“Zero Down” scams are the easiest, simplest type of fraud. It is so easy to perpetrate, in fact, that this scam artist ran his operation from prison: 

On an autumn day two years ago, Colorado issued a warrant to arrest Taiwan Lee, a state prisoner who had vanished on parole.

He hadn’t gone far. While police looked for him, he bought three houses at inflated prices in Arapahoe County with the help of lenders who put up the entire $1.9 million.

After he was caught and jailed, he managed to buy two more. Until the foreclosures commenced, Lee owned five villas in an affluent gated community while living behind prison bars 150 miles away.

The cast of characters in this foreclosure tale includes drug dealers who went straight from prison to the home-acquisition business, a developer with ties to an international Christian group, a state-licensed real estate broker who saw nothing peculiar and an appraiser who has disappeared.

Taiwan Lee is among a group of former inmates and others accused of buying 17 homes for inflated prices and taking $2.1 million from excess loan proceeds.

His buying spree is an extreme example of something that happens every day in Colorado, the state with the worst foreclosure rate in the United States. To read the full article…

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

Mortgage Fraud: The Worst Crime You’ve Never Heard Of

Posted by mortgageforensics on November 8, 2006

Recently, a developer regaled me with a story about a house that seemed to be cursed. Although he beautifully renovated it and priced it below market, the Oakland bungalow just wouldn’t sell. Deals fell through repeatedly for bizarre and unrelated reasons: Buyers got cold feet, or moved — one was even arrested. By the time the fourth deal collapsed, the developer was in an acute state of financial panic.

So, when one of the mortgage brokers who had helped a previous prospective buyer called with a new one who would close the deal for — get this — $100,000 over the asking price, he naturally jumped at the offer. To read the full article…

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (loan agent), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

Georgia Attorney Pleads Guilty to Fraud

Posted by mortgageforensics on October 24, 2006

The U.S. Attorney for Atlanta has announced that on September 26, 2006 MICHAEL M. HIPE, 42, of Snellville, Georgia, pleaded guilty  in federal district court to conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud.
In May 2006, HIPE was indicted along with co-defendants ERIC FRIEDMAN, BRIANNE FRIEDMAN and TIMOTHY BAUER on two counts of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and money laundering, two counts of mail fraud, and eight counts of money laundering.
According to United States Attorney Nahmias and the information presented in court: In 2000, HIPE and co-defendant ERIC FRIEDMAN became partners in an used car sales business called “Hipe Motors” in the metro Atlanta area. HIPE invested in the business and ERIC FRIEDMAN ran the business. In order to raise money to operate the business, in the summer of 2000, HIPE purchased four new condominiums in the metropolitan Atlanta area.  ERIC FRIEDMAN prepared false loan applications and supporting documentation, including tax returns, which misrepresented HIPE’s income.  At the real estate closings, HIPE signed the false loan applications, certifying them as accurate and true.

In order to pull money out from the closings, ERIC FRIEDMAN and HIPE misrepresented to the lenders that a portion of the loan proceeds would be used for the renovation and construction of the properties, even though the condominiums were new or otherwise did not need renovation or upgrade.  Further, ERIC FRIEDMAN and MICHAEL HIPE misrepresented to the lenders that the construction work was to be performed by “The Fabricators, Inc.,” which in fact was a name of a shell company, not  incorporated in the State of Georgia. ERIC FRIEDMAN and HIPE used the monies to finance Hipe Motors and for ERIC FRIEDMAN’s personal expenses.  The funds obtained at closings were run through HIPE’s bank accounts and then run through ERIC FRIEDMAN’s and BRIANNE FRIEDMAN’s bank accounts.  ERIC FRIEDMAN was supposed to obtain tenants for the condominiums and buy cars for the business, but failed to do so.

When HIPE was unable to obtain further financing to purchase condominiums, he introduced his mother and a family friend, both of whom live and work in Massachusetts, to ERIC FRIEDMAN.  ERIC FRIEDMAN persuaded HIPE’s mother to act as a “straw purchaser” on the purchase of three condominiums in Atlanta to provide funds to operate Hipe Motors. ERIC FRIEDMAN prepared loan applications containing false information and supporting documentation, including tax returns which misrepresented HIPE’s mother’s employment and income.  At two of the three real estate closings for his mother, HIPE, along with ERIC FRIEDMAN, acted as her attorneys, and executed the documents, including the loan applications.

ERIC FRIEDMAN also persuaded HIPE’s family friend to provide him with his credit information.  Once FRIEDMAN obtained that information, he opened a checking account at Wachovia Bank in the name of the family friend “d/b/a The Fabricators,” Inc.  In June 2002, at ERIC FRIEDMAN’s behest, the family friend purchased 104 Chablis Court, Braselton, Georgia, as a home for ERIC M. FRIEDMAN and BRIANNE FRIEDMAN and for the purpose of pulling money out of the transaction to further finance Hipe Motors. The transaction was also financed through the submission of a false loan application prepared by FRIEDMAN. At ERIC FRIEDMAN’s behest, in February 2004, the family friend sold that property to straw purchaser/borrower TIMOTHY BAUER to obtain more money.  At that real estate closing, BAUER signed an ERIC FRIEDMAN-prepared false loan application, which misrepresented his income and his intentions to reside at that address.
The lenders have foreclosed on all seven condominiums that HIPE and his mother purchased, because FRIEDMAN, HIPE, and HIPE’s mother have failed to make the monthly mortgage payments.  The lenders’ loss amount on the condominiums exceeds $500,000.

HIPE pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud.  He could receive a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentencing for HIPE has not yet been scheduled by United States District Judge Orinda D. Evans. On August 23, 2006, co-defendant ERIC FRIEDMAN pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, attempt to evade the payment of income taxes, credit card fraud, and interstate transportation of cars obtained by fraud.  He could receive a maximum sentence of forty years in prison and a fine of up to $1,250,000.  No sentencing date is scheduled. Trial for BRIANNE FRIEDMAN and TIMOTHY BAUER is scheduled for December 11, 2006.

Posted in Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 2 Comments »