The Mortgage Expert Witness

Mortgage & Real Estate Expert Witness – Mortgage Fraud | Real Estate Fraud

Archive for the ‘Fraud (appraiser)’ Category

Bad Appraisal By Lender

Posted by mortgageforensics on October 7, 2008

Question:

In 2007, I applied for a 2nd mortgage for debt consolidation through Capital One Mortgage over the phone and was immediately approved over the phone. When I inquired as to when they would be doing an inspection on my studio (condo), I was advised by the mortgage broker they pulled my value off the internet and didn’t need to do an appraisal.  

My 1st mortgage balance was $82,000 and the broker said I could take out an additional $45,000 because the value of my condo was within reason based on his report.  I subsequently closed on the loan and 30 days later my 2nd mortgage was sold to Countrywide Home Loans.  

I’ve been paying my loan timely ever since and decided to have my own appraisal this past July to see where I stood in current market conditions here in Chicago.  I was agast when the appraisal came in at $90,000!  This bothered me so much I requested and obtained a copy of the valuation report used for my 2nd mortgage and was agast again when I found out the broker used Realquest.com.  The report I have does not list the square footage of my condo or anything, just a fair market value.  When I reviewed the comps used by the report, they are all 1 and 2 bedroom condos so obviously I’m seriously upside down in my mortgage and was compared to units that don’t even match what I have.  I have a studio and these are 1 and 2 bedroom condo’s.  Big difference!  

Is there anything I can do?  Is this considered fraud on Countrywide’s part who now owns the loan?  Can I pursue this further?  I have documentation of all the homes used for comps that were incorrect.

Answer:

Capital One used an evaluation model, rather than an appraisal, to determine the value of your condo. This has been a common practice used by many lenders even to this date. The model – basically a software program which uses sales in your area to estimate the value – gives a ballpark figure; unfortunately, many times it is way off the mark.

A claim could be made that Capital One fraudulently induced you to enter into a bad transaction, based on a bad valuation of the property. Quite a few lawsuits have been filed around the country based on similar claims, and that option is open to you.

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (lender) | Tagged: , | 2 Comments »

Mortgage Fraud: Should the Lender be Sued by the Borrower?

Posted by mortgageforensics on September 6, 2008

A mortgage broker submits a fraudulent loan file to a lender, which promptly funds the loan. The borrower – whose identity has been stolen by the mortgage broker – doesn’t even know that he is now the proud owner of an overpriced white elephant, which promptly goes into default.

Sounds familiar? The mortgage broker/realtor/closing agent used the stolen identity of the “buyer” to defraud the lender, and is now being sued by the man whose identity he had stolen. But should the buyer add the lender as a defendant?

The plaintiff’s attorney thought of the lender as a fellow-victim, and was about to suggest to the bank to join the suit as a co-plaintiff, but something which caught his eye made him change his mind: the appraisal.

The appraisal, forged by the mortgage broker, raised more questions that it answered. The comps were all inappropriate and any trained underwriter would have recognized it immediately as a work of fiction. Instead, the lender (one of the largest savings banks in the U.S.), accepted it as is without reviewing it.

The lender’s carelessness helped the mortgage broker pull off the scam. After careful review, the plaintiff’s attorney decided to add the lender to the lawsuit – not as a co-plaintiff, but as a defendant.

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), mortgage fraud | Tagged: , , | 6 Comments »

Say Goodbye to “Stated Income” Sub-Prime Loans

Posted by mortgageforensics on December 18, 2007

On December 18 the Fed endorsed new rules that would give people taking out home mortgages new protections against shady lending practices.

The proposed rules, approved in a 5-0 vote by the board, are geared to providing safeguards to the riskiest “subprime” borrowers, already painfully stung by the housing and credit debacles.

The proposal is expected to apply to new loans made by all types of lenders, including banks and brokers. The plan could be finalized next year.

The Fed, which has regulatory powers over the nation’s banking system, is proposing:

  • Restricting lenders from penalizing certain subprime borrowers — those with tarnished credit or low incomes — who pay off their loans early. The restriction would apply to loans that meet certain conditions, including that the penalty expire at least 60 days before any possible payment increase.
  • Forcing lenders to make sure that subprime borrowers set aside money to pay for taxes and insurance.
  • Barring lenders from making loans when they don’t have proof of a borrower’s income.
  • Prohibiting lenders from engaging in a pattern or practice of lending without considering a borrower’s ability to repay a home loan from sources other than the home’s value.

“Unfair and deceptive acts and practices hurt not just borrowers and their families, but entire communities, and indeed, the economy as a whole,” said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in prepared remarks. “They have no place in our mortgage system,” he added.

Fed policymakers also are considering requiring financial disclosures to borrowers early enough to use while shopping for a mortgage. Lenders could not charge fees — except for a fee to obtain a credit report — until after the consumer receives the disclosures. The Fed also will consider prohibiting certain types of misleading or deceptive advertising for certain loans. It also would require that all applicable rates or payments be disclosed in ads with equal prominence as advertised introductory “teaser rate.”

In addition, the Fed is expected to propose barring lenders from paying mortgage brokers a fee that exceeds the amount the would-be borrower had agreed to in advance that the broker would receive.

And, the Fed would ban certain practices, such as failing to credit a mortgage payment to a borrower’s account when the company servicing the mortgage receives it. The Fed also would prohibit a broker or other company from coercing or encouraging an appraiser to misrepresent the value of a home.

Before taking effect, the rules must be voted on again following a period of public comment and possible revisions.

The Fed’s response has taken on heightened importance given the meltdown in the housing and credit markets that has led to record numbers of home foreclosures. The crisis has raised the odds that the economy might fall into a recession, roiled Wall Street and given Democrats and Republicans much fodder to blame each other.

The plan, if ultimately adopted, offers Bernanke, who took over the helm in February 2006, an important opportunity to put his imprint on the Fed’s regulatory powers. Some critics have complained that Bernanke’s predecessor — Alan Greenspan, who ran the Fed for 18½ years — failed to act as a forceful regulator especially during the 2001-2005 housing boom, when easy credit spurred lots of subprime home loans and many exotic types of mortgages.

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), mortgage fraud | Tagged: , , | 3 Comments »

Ex-NFL Star Indicted for Mortgage Fraud

Posted by mortgageforensics on June 15, 2007

FIVE INDICTED IN MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEME

[HOUSTON, TX] – A licensed Texas attorney and real estate developer, a sports agent, two bank loan officers, and a real estate appraiser have been indicted in a multimillion dollar mortgage fraud scheme, United States Attorney Don DeGabrielle, interim Special Agent in Charge Alex J. Turner of the FBI Houston Division, and Special Agent in Charge Daniel P. Salas of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced today.

Jerome Karam, 44, of Friendswood, TX, a real estate developer and licensed Texas lawyer; Dwight Sean Jones, 44, of Beverly Hills, CA, a former NFL player and sports agent; Tommy Jay Trammel, 44, and David Ranostaj, 40, both of Houston and former loan officers with Southwest Bank of Texas, Bank of Houston and Whitney National Bank, and Jay Westrick, 44, of Houston, a real estate appraiser, have been charged in a 12-count indictment for their alleged involvement in a mortgage fraud scheme that allegedly reached every aspect of a real estate loan: seller, buyer/borrower, loan officer, appraiser, escrow officer, and title company. For the full article...

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), embezzlement, fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 1 Comment »

Did You ‘State’ Your Income On Your ‘Stated Income’ Loan?

Posted by mortgageforensics on June 12, 2007

Well, for those of you who live in Arizona, we hope you did not inflate your income on your loan application. House Bill 2040 – about to be signed by the Governor – makes that a felony in your state. Arizona is among the top 10 states in the number of foreclosures filed this year.

Eric Forster

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 1 Comment »

From the FBI: All You Need to Know About Mortgage Fraud

Posted by mortgageforensics on May 27, 2007

MORTGAGE FRAUD INDICATORS

Inflated Appraisals
• Exclusive use of one appraiser

Increased Commissions/Bonuses – Brokers and Appraisers
• Bonuses paid (outside or at settlement) for fee-based services
• Higher than customary fees

Falsifications on Loan Applications
• Buyers told/explained how to falsify the mortgage application
• Requested to sign blank application

Fake Supporting Loan Documentation
• Requested to sign blank employee or bank forms
• Requested to sign other types of blank forms

Purchase Loans Disguised as Refinance
• Purchase loans that are disguised as refinances
requires less documentation/lender scrutiny

Investors-Short Term Investments with Guaranteed Re-Purchase
• Investors used to flip property prices for fixed percentage
• Multiple “Holding Companies” utilized to increase
property values

COMMON MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEMES

Property Flipping – Property is purchased, falsely appraised at a higher value, and then quickly sold. What makes property illegal is that the appraisal information is fraudulent. The schemes typically involve one or more of the following: fraudulent appraisals, doctored loan documentation, inflating buyer income, etc. Kickbacks to buyers, investors, property/loan brokers, appraisers, title company employees are common in this scheme. A home worth $20,000 may be appraised for $80,000 or higher in this type of scheme.

Silent Second – The buyer of a property borrows the down payment from the seller through the issuance of a non-disclosed second mortgage. The primary lender believes the borrower has invested his own money in the down payment, when in fact, it is borrowed. The second mortgage may not be recorded to further conceal its status from the primary lender.

Nominee Loans/Straw Buyers – The identity of the borrower is concealed through the use of a nominee who allows the borrower to use the nominee’s name and credit history to apply for a loan.

Fictitious/Stolen Identity – A fictitious/stolen identity may be used on the loan application. The applicant may be involved in an identity theft scheme: the applicant’s name, personal identifying information and credit history are used without the true person’s knowledge.

Inflated Appraisals – An appraiser acts in collusion with a borrower and provides a misleading appraisal report to the lender. The report inaccurately states an inflated property value.

Foreclosure Schemes – The perpetrator identifies homeowners who are at risk of defaulting on loans or whose houses are already in foreclosure. Perpetrators mislead the homeowners into believing that they can save their homes in exchange for a transfer of the deed and up-front fees. The perpetrator profits from these schemes by remortgaging the property or pocketing fees paid by the homeowner.

Equity Skimming – An investor may use a straw buyer, false income documents, and false credit reports, to obtain a mortgage loan in the straw buyer’s name. Subsequent to closing, the straw buyer signs the property over to the investor in a quit claim deed which relinquishes all rights to the property and provides no guaranty to title. The investor does not make any mortgage payments and rents the property until foreclosure takes place several months later.

Air Loans – This is a non-existent property loan where there is usually no collateral. An example of an air loan would be where a broker invents borrowers and properties, establishes accounts for payments, and maintains custodial accounts for escrows. They may set up an office with a bank of telephones, each one used as the employer, appraiser, credit agency, etc., for verification purposes.

Mortgage Fraud Prevention Measures

General Fraud Tips

Mortgage Fraud is a growing problem throughout the United States. People want to believe their homes are worth more than they are, and with housing booms going on throughout the U.S., there are people who try to capitalize on the situation and make an easy profit.

Tips to protect you from becoming a victim of Mortgage Fraud

• Get referral for real estate and mortgage professionals. Check the licenses of the industry professionals with state, county, or city regulatory agencies.
• If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. An outrageous promise of extraordinary profit in a short period of time signals a problem.
• Be wary of strangers and unsolicited contacts, as well as high-pressure sales techniques.
• Look at written information to include recent comparable sales in the area, and other documents such as tax assessments to verify the value of the property.
• Understand what you are signing and agreeing to–If you do not understand,
re-read the documents, or seek assistance from an attorney.
• Make sure the name on your application matches the name on your identification.
• Review the title history to determine if the property has been sold multiple times within a short period–It could mean that this property has been “flipped” and the value falsely inflated.
• Know and understand the terms of your mortgage–Check your information against the information in the loan documents to ensure they are accurate and complete.
• Never sign any loan documents that contain blanks–This leaves you vulnerable to fraud.
• Check out the tips on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) website at http://www.StopMortgageFraud.com for additional advice on avoiding mortgage fraud.

Mortgage Debt Elimination Schemes

• Be aware of e-mails or web-based advertisements that promote the elimination of mortgage loans, credit card and other debts while requesting an up-front fee to prepare documents to satisfy the debt. The documents are typically entitled Declaration of Voidance, Bond for Discharge of Debt, Bill of Exchange, Due Bill, Redemption Certificate, or other similar variations. These documents do not achieve what they purport.
• There is no magic cure-all to relieve you of debts you incurred.
• Borrowers may end up paying thousands of dollars in fees without the elimination or reduction of any debt.

Foreclosure Fraud Schemes

Perpetrators mislead the homeowners into believing that they can save their homes in exchange for a transfer of the deed, usually in the form of a Quit-Claim Deed, and up-front fees. The perpetrator profits from these schemes by remortgaging the property or pocketing fees paid by the homeowner without preventing the foreclosure. The victim suffers the loss of the property as well as the up-front fees.

• Be aware of offers to “save” homeowners who are at risk of defaulting on loans or whose houses are already in foreclosure.
• Seek a qualified Credit Counselor or attorney to assist.
Predatory Lending Schemes

• Before purchasing a home, research information about prices of homes in the neighborhood.
• Shop for a lender and compare costs. Beware of lenders who tell you that they are your only chance of getting a loan or owning your own home.
• Beware of “No Money Down” loans–This is a gimmick used to entice consumers to purchase property that they likely cannot afford or are not qualified to purchase. Be wary of mortgage professional who falsely alter information to qualify the consumer for the loan.
• Do not let anyone convince you to borrow more money than you can afford to repay.
• Do not let anyone persuade you into making a false statement such as overstating your income, the source of your down payment, or the nature and length of your employment.
• Never sign a blank document or a document containing blanks.
• Read and carefully review all loan documents signed at closing or prior to closing for accuracy, completeness and omissions.
• Be aware of cost or loan terms at closing that are not what you have agreed to.
• Do not sign anything you do not understand.
• Be suspicious if the cost of a home improvement goes up if you accept the contractor’s financing.
• If it sounds too good to be true–it probably is!

Posted in Contract law, Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (builder), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), Fraud (seller), Fraud (title/escrow), embezzlement, fraud (attorney), mortgage fraud | 2 Comments »

This Cop Did His Mortgage Scamming On The Side

Posted by mortgageforensics on February 19, 2007

Susan W. Brooks, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, announced that MICHAEL C. SMITH, 45, Indianapolis, Indiana, JOSEPH BRITTON, 47, Fishers, and MARK SPECKMAN, 48, McCordsville, were sentenced to federal prison on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week by U.S. District Judge Sarah Evans Barker following their convictions for conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering by a federal jury on September 22, 2006, following a two week trial.

SMITH, who was an IPD police officer at the time of the indictment, was sentenced on Wednesday to 57 months’ imprisonment, 5 years supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution of approximately 1.1 million dollars. SMITH was convicted of two separate conspiracies to commit wire fraud and money laundering in connection with two mortgage fraud schemes ongoing in Indianapolis between 2001 and 2003. The schemes involved two separate mortgage brokerage companies—Quantum Investments and American Savings Mortgage (ASM). SMITH, who worked part-time as a licensed real estate appraiser, provided inflated appraisals for loans to purchase real estate in Indianapolis and Marion, Indiana to the two mortgage brokerage companies. The appraisals were used to obtain loans on properties well in excess of their true value. At the sentencing hearing, Judge Barker found that SMITH had attempted to obstruct justice during the investigation by attempting to persuade a co-conspirator to lie about the condition of the property that SMITH appraised during the scheme. SMITH was terminated from the Indianapolis Police Department following his convictions.

BRITTON and SPECKMAN were both sentenced on Tuesday to 33 months in prison, 3 years supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution of approximately $900,000 for their roles in providing properties for sale through American Savings Mortgage and then paying kickbacks to others in the scheme. BRITTON and SPECKMAN were partners in Pacific Group and BRITTON owned Aspen Group while Speckman owned HomeSource Investment LLC. BRITTON and SPECKMAN bought properties in the names of the three businesses that were sold at approximately double their true value. After BRITTON and SPECKMAN received the loan proceeds, they kicked back some of the money through a company called Senicure, to the others involved in the conspiracy including the owners of ASM and the buyers of the properties.

At the sentencing hearing for BRITTON, the government presented evidence that Aspen Group (owned by BRITTON), Pacific Group (owned by BRITTON and SPECKMAN), and Del Mar Charitable (owned by BRITTON) had been third on the City of Indianapolis’s Top Ten list of properties owners who failed to maintain their investment properties in a safe condition and that the companies had been cited by the city more than 450 times for health and safety violations on their properties.

This case was the result of a four-year investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Postal Inspection Service working as a team on the United States Attorney’s Mortgage Fraud Task Force. Susan Brooks stated: “I applaud the hard work and dedication of all those involved with unraveling the complex schemes that go into this crime. Mortgage fraud contributes to the deterioration of neighborhoods. Properties that remain vacant for long periods of time can contribute to a rise in crime in some of our neighborhoods. I am proud of the federal law enforcement efforts to help the City.”

According to Assistant United States Attorneys Donna Eide and James Warden, who prosecuted the case for the government, SMITH, BRITTON, and SPECKMAN were the last of 16 defendants charged in the schemes to be sentenced. All except one defendant was sentenced to federal prison.

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), Fraud (realtor), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

Colorado may criminalize coercion of appraisers

Posted by mortgageforensics on January 9, 2007

Many of the mortgage fraud cases in the past 4 years have been done through collusion between the mortgage broker and the appraiser. The latter, who gets most of his referrals from the former, has agreed many times to cooperate in inflating property values. Colorado is fighting back:

Mortgage brokers would be expressly prohibited from compensating, coercing or intimidating real estate appraisers to obtain inflated appraisals under legislation proposed by the Colorado attorney general.
The legislation, targeted at mortgage fraud, would also prohibit appraisers from knowingly submitting a false home valuation, and subject violators to misdemeanor criminal prosecution for a first offense and felony charges for those with prior convictions.

Attorney General John Suthers said in a press release that two state representatives — one a Republican, one a Democrat — will sponsor the legislation this session. The bill would also give the state’s Division of Real Estate the authority to revoke or deny the registration of mortgage brokers who have been prohibited by any court from engaging in deceptive conduct relating to brokering a mortgage loan.

According to RealtyTrac, Colorado had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation for eight months in 2006, before Nevada surpassed it in November. One of every 362 homes in Colorado was in default, in the process of trustee sale, or real estate owned in November, RealtyTrac reported.

In May 2006, Colorado enacted stiffer penalties for those convicted of mortgage fraud and provided consumer protections for families facing foreclosure. The Colorado Foreclosure Protection Act requires that all transactions between homeowners and foreclosure consultants or equity purchasers be in writing, prohibits consultants who provide advice or assistance from acquiring any interest in the homeowner’s property, and calls for a three-day “cooling off” period.

Inman News

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (loan agent) | Leave a Comment »

“Flipping” Homes Nets Perp 24 Years in Prison

Posted by mortgageforensics on December 28, 2006

What makes this case so different (and explains the harsh penalties) is that the perpetrators created a self-contained mortgage fraud operation. It included a loan officer, who was the mastermind behind the scheme, bank underwriters who cooperated and approved the loans submitted by the loan officer, and an unlicensed appraiser who supplied the fraudulent appraisals:

A federal judge has sentenced a former mortgage loan officer convicted of organizing a Washington, D.C., house-flipping scheme involving mortgage fraud to more than 24 years in prison.

In sentencing Charles E. Hall Sr. to serve 293 months in prison and to pay restitution of $5.04 million, Judge Sterling Johnson called the former loan officer “a predator” whom the community must be protected from.

A jury convicted Hall, 37, in August of conspiracy, bank fraud, wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors said the former Guaranty Residential Lending loan officer organized a conspiracy to flip more than 30 homes, netting more than $5.2 million.

Hall recruited straw buyers and submitted loan applications listing false assets, income and other information to apply for $14 million in loans, according a statement released by U.S. Attorney Jeffrey A. Taylor. To read the full article…

Posted in Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (lender), Fraud (loan agent), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »

“Zero Down” Fraud Stopped in Brooklyn

Posted by mortgageforensics on December 5, 2006

There is very little mortgage lenders can do to prevent “Zero Down” scams during times of easy money and rising property values:

NEW YORK – A Brooklyn mortgage fraud ring duped homebuyers and lenders by falsifying documents and overstating property values, ruining the credit of many people who bought homes in minority neighborhoods, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said Wednesday.Spitzer sued 11 people over the scheme, which he said lasted from 2002 until early this year and hurt dozens of borrowers and lenders, in a lawsuit filed with the state supreme court in Manhattan. To read the full article…

Posted in Foreclosure, Fraud (appraiser), Fraud (borrower), Fraud (buyer), Fraud (loan agent), mortgage fraud | Leave a Comment »